🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from mediators to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations reopen.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the strikes began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Final Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to impose their demands during the discussions. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the ultimate resolution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and respect, they will obtain a answer in the identical tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more united, and more supportive of the government and the country in the face of this attack."