🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's youth". A law could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is given. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," stated the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and fit for young users," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the local government level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some politicians to follow this path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies take a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this global discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others indicate that governments globally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.